Building Romania’s Investment Economy: Capital-Market Deepening and Industrial Competitiveness

1. Introduction

Romania is entering a decisive phase in its economic development.^[1] After several years marked by external shocks, fiscal pressure, inflation, political uncertainty, and regional security concerns, the country now faces a strategic choice: whether to remain a consumption-driven emerging economy with periodic macroeconomic vulnerabilities, or to consolidate a more resilient growth model based on investment, infrastructure, energy security, financial deepening, and stronger domestic companies.^[2]

The central policy challenge is not the absence of growth potential. Romania has substantial advantages: membership in the European Union, access to large EU funding programmes, a sizeable domestic market, a relatively diversified industrial base, agricultural capacity, energy resources, a growing capital market, and several increasingly sophisticated corporate groups.^[3] These factors give Romania a credible platform for medium-term convergence with more advanced European economies.^[4] However, potential alone is insufficient. The key question is whether Romania can convert these advantages into sustained productivity growth, higher investment absorption, deeper capital markets, and improved institutional credibility.

Romania’s recent growth model has relied heavily on domestic consumption, wage growth, and public spending. While this model supported rapid convergence in previous years, it also contributed to structural imbalances, including fiscal deficits, external deficits, and inflationary pressure. A more sustainable model requires a gradual shift toward investment-led growth. This means directing public and private capital toward transport infrastructure, energy infrastructure, industrial capacity, digitalization, defence-related production, agriculture and food processing, and higher-value services. Such a transition would reduce dependence on short-term consumption cycles and strengthen the productive base of the economy.

Fiscal consolidation is central to this transition. Romania cannot build a credible investment-led model without restoring confidence in public finances. The objective should not be austerity for its own sake, but a rebalancing of the state’s role: reducing inefficient expenditure while protecting growth-enhancing investment. The credibility of this adjustment will influence borrowing costs, sovereign ratings, investor confidence, and the ability of both the state and Romanian companies to access international capital on favourable terms.

Energy security represents another strategic pillar. Romania’s domestic gas production, electricity mix, renewable potential, and major offshore gas projects can position the country as one of the more energy-secure economies in Central and Eastern Europe. This creates opportunities beyond the energy sector itself. Reliable and competitively priced energy can support industrial investment, reduce external vulnerability, and strengthen Romania’s role in regional supply chains. Energy policy should therefore be treated not only as a sectoral issue, but as a foundation for reindustrialization and long-term competitiveness.

The capital market is equally important.^[5] A deeper and more liquid Bucharest Stock Exchange can help Romanian companies finance expansion, improve governance, increase transparency, and attract international investors. However, the market remains constrained by limited liquidity, a relatively small number of large issuers, insufficient IPO activity, and dependence on a few dominant sectors. Romania’s transition from a dividend-oriented market to a broader growth-and-investment market will require more listings, better analyst coverage, stronger institutional participation, and continued progress toward international index inclusion.

Romanian companies are already beginning to play a larger role in this transformation. Banks, energy companies, utilities, technology firms, food-service groups, and industrial producers are increasingly using capital markets, bond issuance, mergers and acquisitions, and regional expansion to support growth. This corporate development matters for public policy because national competitiveness depends not only on macroeconomic stability, but also on the ability of domestic firms to scale, innovate, export, and compete beyond the local market.

This policy paper argues that Romania’s next stage of development should be built around an investment-led convergence strategy. Such a strategy requires five priorities: credible fiscal consolidation, accelerated EU funds absorption, energy security and industrial competitiveness, capital-market deepening, and support for Romanian corporate champions capable of regional expansion. If these priorities are pursued consistently, Romania can strengthen its position as a major Central and Eastern European economy and reduce the vulnerabilities associated with its previous consumption-led model. If they are not, the country risks remaining trapped between strong potential and incomplete implementation.

2. Romania’s Macroeconomic Positioning: From Vulnerability to Investment-Led Convergence

Romania’s medium-term economic outlook depends on its ability to move from a growth model driven primarily by consumption toward one anchored in investment, productivity, and structural convergence. The country has already achieved a significant degree of income convergence with the European Union, but this convergence remains uneven and incomplete. Bucharest-Ilfov has become one of the most dynamic regions in the country, while several Romanian regions continue to lag well behind the EU average.^[6] This internal divergence is a central policy issue. It suggests that Romania’s next stage of growth cannot rely only on national-level expansion, but must also involve stronger territorial development, better transport connectivity, and more effective use of EU funds to integrate less developed regions into the country’s productive economy.

The investment agenda is therefore not simply a macroeconomic preference; it is a convergence strategy. Romania’s access to EU recovery and cohesion funding gives the state a major opportunity to accelerate modernization in infrastructure, energy, digitalization, public administration, and regional development. If absorbed effectively, these funds can improve long-term growth potential by reducing infrastructure gaps, increasing administrative capacity, and supporting private-sector investment. The policy priority should be to treat EU funds as a mechanism for structural transformation. This requires stronger project preparation, faster implementation, better coordination between central and local authorities, and a clear hierarchy of investments based on productivity impact.^[7]

2.1 Key Economic Indicators

Romania’s macroeconomic challenge is that this investment agenda must be pursued while correcting fiscal and external imbalances. The country entered this phase with a high budget deficit, inflationary pressure, and a trade deficit shaped by strong import demand and uneven export performance. These vulnerabilities do not eliminate Romania’s growth potential, but they do constrain the policy space available to the government. A credible macroeconomic framework must therefore combine fiscal consolidation with protection of public investment. Consolidation that cuts productive investment would weaken the very growth model Romania needs to build. By contrast, consolidation focused on revenue collection, expenditure efficiency, and prioritization of investment would strengthen investor confidence while preserving long-term convergence.

Fiscal consolidation should be understood as a credibility mechanism. Romania’s ability to finance infrastructure, support energy investments, and maintain access to international capital depends partly on the confidence of investors, rating agencies, and European institutions in the sustainability of public finances. A gradual but credible deficit-reduction path can lower risk perceptions and reduce financing costs over time. However, credibility requires consistency. Frequent policy reversals, unpredictable taxation, and weak implementation would undermine the adjustment even if headline deficit numbers improve. The government therefore needs not only fiscal targets, but also a stable institutional framework that allows companies and investors to plan with confidence.^[8]

Inflation represents a second constraint on Romania’s transition to investment-led growth.^[9] Elevated inflation reduces real incomes, complicates monetary policy, and increases the cost of capital. Although part of the inflationary pressure has been connected to fiscal and administrative measures, the broader policy objective should be to return inflation to a level compatible with investment planning and financial stability. Lower inflation would allow monetary policy to become less restrictive over time, supporting credit growth and private investment. The sequencing is important: Romania cannot rely on lower interest rates alone to stimulate growth if fiscal policy remains uncertain. Monetary easing will be most effective if accompanied by fiscal credibility and improved investment absorption.

The labour market is another important dimension of Romania’s macroeconomic position. Low unemployment indicates resilience, but youth unemployment and skills mismatches point to deeper structural weaknesses. An investment-led economy requires not only capital expenditure, but also human capital capable of supporting industrial upgrading, digitalization, energy transition, and higher-value services. Policy should therefore link the investment agenda with education, vocational training, labour-market activation, and regional mobility. Without this connection, Romania risks investing in infrastructure without generating the productivity gains needed to sustain convergence.^[10]

2.2 Key Sectors for Romanian Competitivity

Sectorally, Romania’s growth prospects are strongest where public investment, private capital, and strategic necessity overlap. Industry remains central because it contributes significantly to exports and employment, while nearshoring trends can increase Romania’s relevance in European supply chains. Construction and infrastructure can generate spillovers into logistics, real estate, industrial parks, and regional development.^[11] Energy has strategic importance because domestic resources, renewables, nuclear capacity, and gas production can support both security and competitiveness. Agriculture also offers significant potential, but the policy objective should be to move beyond raw commodity production toward processing, branding, logistics, and higher domestic value added.

Defence and security-related investment are likely to become more important in Romania’s economic model. Romania’s geographic position on the EU and NATO eastern flank gives defence spending a broader economic significance.^[12] Higher defence allocations can support infrastructure, industrial production, logistics, technology, and dual-use capabilities if they are connected to domestic suppliers and long-term procurement planning.^[13] The policy risk is that defence spending becomes primarily import-driven. The policy opportunity is to use security needs to develop domestic industrial capacity and deepen Romania’s participation in European defence supply chains.

Finally, external competitiveness will be a decisive test of Romania’s new growth model. A country can sustain consumption-led expansion for a period, but investment-led convergence requires stronger export capacity, higher productivity, and more competitive firms. Romania’s trade deficit shows the limits of a model in which domestic demand rises faster than domestic production.^[14] The solution is not to suppress consumption indefinitely, but to increase the economy’s capacity to produce, process, and export higher-value goods and services. This requires infrastructure, energy reliability, skilled labour, predictable regulation, and financing channels that allow companies to scale.

3. Capital Markets as a Channel of Economic Modernization

Romania’s transition toward an investment-led growth model will depend not only on fiscal policy, EU funds, and public infrastructure, but also on the capacity of its capital market to mobilize private savings, attract foreign institutional investors, and finance corporate expansion.

The Bucharest Stock Exchange has made visible progress in recent years. In 2024, the exchange recorded 48 listings, with financing rounds exceeding RON 22 billion, while Premier Energy completed an IPO of almost EUR 140 million, the largest IPO by a Romanian entrepreneurial company on BVB in the previous five years.^[15] These developments show that Romania is no longer a marginal capital-market story. It has become a market with recognizable corporate champions, attractive dividend yields, and a growing record of successful capital-market transactions.

Domestic institutional investors are increasingly important to this process. Romania’s private pension funds have become the country’s main institutional investors, supporting long-term financing needs and contributing to the development of the domestic capital market. ASF data show that private pension funds invested mainly in Romanian government securities, equities, and corporate bonds, with more than 94 percent of their total assets invested in instruments issued in Romania.^[16] This matters because a stable domestic institutional base can reduce dependence on short-term foreign flows and provide demand for new equity and bond issuance.

However, Romania’s capital market remains structurally underdeveloped relative to the size and potential of the economy. Liquidity is still concentrated in a limited number of large issuers, especially in energy, utilities, and financial services. Trading volumes remain insufficient for many international investors, particularly large funds that require the ability to enter and exit positions without materially affecting prices. This creates a persistent discount between Romanian listed companies and comparable regional or European peers. The result is a paradox: Romania offers attractive companies and growth potential, but the market infrastructure does not yet fully allow that potential to be reflected in valuation.

3.1 Romanian Capital Markets and Foreign Investors

A key constraint is the limited number of large, liquid listings. The Romanian economy contains many companies with the scale, profitability, and governance potential to become public issuers, but too few have chosen to list. This weakens market depth and limits sectoral diversification. It also reduces the attractiveness of Romania for global investors, who often evaluate markets not only by the quality of individual companies but by the breadth and liquidity of the investment universe. More IPOs would improve price discovery, increase free float, attract analyst coverage, and strengthen Romania’s case for broader international index inclusion. BVB itself identifies support for liquidity, diversification of market mechanisms, infrastructure development, attraction of new issuers, and increased retail participation as priorities for market development.^[17]

The policy priority should therefore be to expand the pipeline of listed companies. This requires action on both the supply and demand sides of the market. On the supply side, privately owned Romanian companies need stronger incentives to consider listing as a tool for growth, succession planning, international visibility, and governance improvement. State-owned companies also remain important. Selective listings or secondary public offerings of profitable state-owned enterprises could increase market capitalization, diversify the exchange, and improve governance standards. On the demand side, the continued development of pension funds, retail participation, and institutional investment will be necessary to absorb new issuance and support secondary-market liquidity.

Romania’s capital market is still strongly associated with dividend investing. This has been an advantage because it has attracted investors seeking stable yield, especially in an environment of regional uncertainty. Many Romanian listed companies have built credibility by distributing substantial dividends and maintaining relatively strong balance sheets. However, the next stage of market development requires a broader equity story. Romania must move from being seen mainly as a dividend market toward being seen as a market where investors can also access growth, industrial expansion, energy transition, digitalization, and regional corporate internationalization.

This does not mean abandoning dividends. Rather, it means balancing shareholder distributions with reinvestment. Companies in strategic sectors such as energy, banking, infrastructure, technology, and industrial production need sufficient retained earnings and market access to finance expansion. Excessively high payout expectations can become a constraint if they limit investment in productive capacity. A more mature market should allow different equity stories to coexist: stable dividend companies, growth companies, infrastructure-linked companies, and regional consolidators. This diversity would make the market more attractive to a wider range of investors.

Bond markets are also increasingly important for Romania’s corporate development. In 2024, the bond market was the most active segment of the Bucharest Stock Exchange primary market, with 32 financing rounds, including issues by the Romanian state and several banks.^[18] Recurrent bond issuance helps companies build investor relationships, establish yield curves, diversify funding sources, and reduce dependence on bank lending. For banks and large energy companies, international bond markets can provide access to deeper pools of capital and improve market discipline. Regular issuance also helps investors understand Romanian corporate risk more accurately, rather than pricing all issuers only through the sovereign-risk lens. Over time, this can contribute to lower financing costs for credible companies.

3.2 Attracting More Foreign Capital

Investor communication is central to this process. International investors require predictability, transparency, and regular engagement. Companies that access capital markets only occasionally often pay a higher cost because investors are less familiar with their business model, governance, and risk profile. By contrast, recurring issuers and actively traded companies can build reputational capital. This is especially important for an emerging market such as Romania, where macroeconomic and political risks can affect investor perceptions even when company fundamentals are strong.

Index inclusion remains another strategic objective. Romania was promoted by FTSE Russell to Emerging Market status in 2020, a step that increased the international visibility of the domestic capital market.^[19] In 2025, MSCI recognized Romania as an “Advanced Frontier Market,” an intermediate category between Frontier and Emerging Market status, citing progress in liquidity, infrastructure, corporate governance, and accessibility for institutional investors.^[20] Progress toward higher index status requires not only strong companies, but also sufficient liquidity, free float, accessibility, settlement reliability, and regulatory predictability. The goal of index promotion should not be pursued as a symbolic achievement. It should be treated as the result of deeper market reforms that make Romania easier and more attractive to invest in.

Capital-market modernization should therefore be integrated into Romania’s broader economic strategy. A deeper stock exchange can support fiscal consolidation by reducing overdependence on public financing, support corporate expansion by providing long-term capital, and support governance reform by increasing transparency. It can also help retain domestic savings inside the Romanian economy and channel them toward productive investment. In this sense, the capital market is not separate from Romania’s convergence agenda. It is one of the mechanisms through which convergence can be financed, disciplined, and made visible to international investors.

The central policy objective should be to transform Romania’s capital market from a relatively narrow, dividend-oriented market into a broader platform for investment-led growth. Achieving this will require more IPOs, larger free floats, stronger analyst coverage, deeper institutional participation, improved retail access, predictable regulation, and sustained engagement with international investors. If these reforms advance, the Bucharest Stock Exchange can become a stronger engine of modernization. If they do not, Romania risks leaving a major source of growth capital underused at precisely the moment when its development model requires more investment, not less.

4. Investment Priorities for Romania’s Next Growth Model

Romania’s transition toward a more resilient growth model depends on its ability to mobilize investment across three connected areas: strategic infrastructure and energy security, financial intermediation and capital-market financing, and the international expansion of domestic companies. These areas should not be treated separately. Energy and infrastructure create the physical conditions for competitiveness; banks and capital markets provide the financing channels; and Romanian companies transform investment into productivity, exports, employment, and regional influence. Together, they define the practical content of an investment-led convergence strategy.

4.1 Strategic Infrastructure and Energy Investment

Romania’s first investment priority is the modernization of strategic infrastructure. Transport, energy, logistics, and digital infrastructure are essential for reducing regional disparities, increasing productivity, and integrating the country more effectively into European supply chains. Without stronger infrastructure, Romania’s convergence will remain uneven: dynamic urban centres will continue to grow, while less developed regions will struggle to attract private investment and retain skilled labour. Romania’s Recovery and Resilience Plan and Cohesion Policy allocation both identify infrastructure, green transition, digitalization, and regional cohesion as central investment priorities.^[21]

Energy is particularly important because it links economic policy with security policy. Romania has a stronger energy position than many countries in the region, due to its domestic gas production, Black Sea offshore potential, nuclear capacity, hydropower, renewables, and growing role of prosumers.^[22] These assets can reduce external vulnerability and create a competitive advantage for industrial production. In a European context marked by high energy costs and geopolitical uncertainty, reliable and domestically anchored energy supply can become one of Romania’s strongest arguments for attracting industrial investment.^[23]

The policy objective should be to use energy security as a platform for reindustrialization. Natural gas projects, renewable energy, grid modernization, storage, nuclear investment, and energy efficiency should be integrated into a single competitiveness strategy. Romania should avoid treating energy only as a source of fiscal revenue or short-term supply security. Its broader value lies in supporting industrial production, chemicals, fertilizers, construction materials, food processing, defence-related manufacturing, logistics, and other energy-dependent sectors. The Neptun Deep offshore gas project is especially relevant in this context, since OMV Petrom and Romgaz estimate first gas for 2027 and describe the project as including ten production wells in the Pelican South and Domino fields.^[24]

However, this requires regulatory predictability. Energy investments are capital-intensive and depend on long planning horizons. Frequent regulatory changes, unclear support schemes, or prolonged market interventions can discourage private capital and increase financing costs. Romania therefore needs a stable energy-policy framework that protects vulnerable consumers while preserving incentives for investment. Targeted social support is preferable to broad interventions that weaken market signals and delay modernization.

4.2 Financing Investment: Banks, Bonds, and Capital Markets

Romania’s second investment priority is the development of stronger financing channels. The country cannot rely only on public expenditure or EU funds to finance its next phase of growth. It also needs banks, bond markets, pension funds, equity markets, and international investors to provide long-term capital to companies and infrastructure projects.

The banking sector remains central to this process. Romanian banks have the capacity to support credit growth, corporate investment, digitalization, and financial inclusion. At the same time, the role of banks is changing. Beyond traditional lending, banks increasingly support bond issuance, wealth management, asset management, and capital-market access. This matters because Romania’s investment needs are too large to be financed through bank lending alone.

Bond markets are becoming increasingly important for Romanian companies. Regular bond issuance allows companies to diversify funding sources, build relationships with institutional investors, and reduce dependence on bank credit. It also improves market discipline, because recurring issuers must communicate clearly, maintain transparency, and demonstrate predictable financial performance. In 2024, the Bucharest Stock Exchange reported that the bond market was its most active primary-market segment, with 32 financing rounds, including government and corporate bond issues.^[25]

The Bucharest Stock Exchange also has a strategic role. A deeper equity market can help Romanian companies finance expansion, improve governance, attract institutional investors, and retain domestic savings inside the national economy. However, the market still needs more large issuers, higher liquidity, broader sectoral diversification, and stronger analyst coverage. Romania’s capital market should move beyond a narrow dividend-focused identity and become a platform for growth companies, infrastructure-linked firms, energy-transition projects, and regional consolidators.

Pension funds are especially important because they provide a stable domestic investor base. Their growth can support both equity and bond markets, reduce dependence on volatile foreign inflows, and create long-term demand for Romanian assets. Public policy should therefore encourage the continued development of institutional investment while also improving retail participation and financial literacy. Romania’s Financial Supervisory Authority has described private pension funds as the country’s main institutional investors, with more than 94 percent of their assets invested in Romanian instruments.^[26]

4.3 Corporate Investment, Scale, and Regional Expansion

Romania’s third investment priority is the scaling of domestic companies. Macroeconomic stability and infrastructure investment matter only if firms can translate them into productivity, exports, innovation, and higher value added. Romania already has companies in banking, energy, utilities, technology, food services, and industrial production that are capable of becoming regional players. Public policy should recognize these firms as part of the country’s competitiveness strategy.

Corporate investment must increasingly focus on scale. Many Romanian firms have strong domestic positions but remain cautious about international expansion. This limits both growth and visibility. Regional expansion through mergers and acquisitions, greenfield investment, partnerships, and exports can help Romanian companies reduce dependence on the domestic cycle, diversify revenue, and build stronger brands. It can also increase Romania’s economic influence in Central and South-Eastern Europe. Romania’s M&A market showed resilience in 2024, with EY reporting 198 transactions in the first nine months of the year, up from 183 in the same period of 2023.^[27]

The technology and industrial sectors show the importance of this shift. Romanian IT and software firms can use acquisitions and foreign-market entry to access larger clients, reduce dependence on individual sectors, and move into higher-value services. Industrial companies can use regional expansion to hedge against fluctuations in domestic public investment and to access new markets for infrastructure-related products. Consumer-facing companies can combine dividend credibility with network expansion and portfolio diversification. In each case, corporate growth depends on the ability to finance investment, manage governance, communicate with investors, and compete outside Romania.

This corporate agenda also has a governance dimension. Companies that use capital markets must become more transparent, more predictable, and more disciplined. This can improve investor confidence and reduce the valuation discount often applied to emerging-market firms. Better governance is therefore not only a compliance issue; it is a growth instrument. It helps firms raise capital, attract institutional investors, and build credibility in foreign markets.

Romania’s investment-led model will succeed only if domestic firms become more ambitious. The state can support this by improving infrastructure, reducing regulatory unpredictability, facilitating access to finance, and using EU funds in ways that crowd in private investment rather than replace it. The goal should not be to protect companies from competition, but to help them reach the scale required to compete regionally.

5. Policy Constraints and Implementation Risks

Romania’s investment-led growth model is credible, but it is not guaranteed. The country has important structural advantages, yet the conversion of these advantages into sustained convergence depends on implementation capacity.

The first constraint is fiscal credibility. Romania needs fiscal consolidation, but the quality of consolidation matters as much as the size of the adjustment. A correction based mainly on tax increases, delayed investment, or across-the-board spending cuts could weaken growth and reduce private-sector confidence. By contrast, a correction based on improved tax collection, expenditure review, administrative efficiency, and prioritization of productive investment would support credibility without undermining convergence. The policy challenge is to reduce the deficit while protecting the investments that raise future growth potential.^[28]

The second constraint is regulatory unpredictability. Investors can manage risk, but they struggle to manage uncertainty created by frequent rule changes, unclear implementation, or retroactive policy adjustments. This is especially important in energy, banking, capital markets, and infrastructure, where investment decisions require long planning horizons. If Romania wants to attract long-term capital, it must provide a more stable regulatory framework. Predictability does not mean the absence of reform; it means reforms should be clearly communicated, phased in responsibly, and consistent with long-term policy objectives.

The third constraint is administrative capacity. Romania has access to significant EU funding, but absorption alone is not enough. The quality of project selection, procurement, implementation, monitoring, and maintenance determines whether public investment produces lasting economic gains. Poorly prepared projects can absorb money without improving productivity. The state therefore needs stronger institutional coordination, better technical capacity, and more disciplined project pipelines. EU funds should be directed toward projects that reduce bottlenecks, connect regions, support private investment, and generate measurable productivity effects.^[29]

The fourth constraint is labour and skills. Investment-led growth cannot be sustained without a workforce capable of supporting higher-value economic activity. Romania faces skills mismatches, demographic pressures, youth unemployment, outward migration, and regional differences in education and labour-market participation.^[30] These problems limit the country’s ability to move into more complex industrial and service activities. Policy should connect investment planning with education reform, vocational training, digital skills, technical universities, and regional labour mobility. Human capital should be treated as infrastructure, not as a separate social-policy issue.^[31]

The fifth constraint is capital-market liquidity. Romania’s capital market has improved, but it remains too narrow to fully support the country’s investment needs. Limited liquidity, few large issuers, and insufficient sectoral diversification reduce the market’s attractiveness to international investors. This weakens valuation, constrains access to equity finance, and limits the role of the stock exchange as a modernization tool. More IPOs, higher free floats, stronger analyst coverage, and deeper institutional participation are necessary if the capital market is to support the next stage of corporate growth.

The sixth constraint is dependence on public investment cycles. Several sectors with strong growth potential, including construction materials, infrastructure services, industrial suppliers, digitalization, and energy-related activities, depend partly on government decisions and public procurement. This creates vulnerability when fiscal consolidation slows public spending. Romania should reduce this risk by encouraging private investment, public-private partnerships where appropriate, regional expansion by domestic companies, and export-oriented industrial strategies. The goal should be to ensure that growth sectors are supported by public investment without becoming entirely dependent on it.

The seventh constraint is the risk of fragmented policy. Romania’s development agenda requires coordination across fiscal policy, infrastructure, energy, education, capital markets, industrial policy, and regional development. If these areas are managed separately, the country may fail to generate the full benefits of investment. For example, energy security will not produce reindustrialization without infrastructure, skills, financing, and predictable regulation. EU funds will not generate convergence if projects are poorly connected to private-sector needs. Capital markets will not deepen without a larger pipeline of credible companies. The policy system therefore needs an integrated approach.

Romania’s main implementation risk is the gap between strategic potential and institutional delivery. The country has the resources to support a stronger growth model, but execution will determine the outcome. To reduce this risk, policy should be guided by four principles: consistency, prioritization, transparency, and coordination. Consistency is needed to build investor confidence. Prioritization is needed because fiscal space is limited. Transparency is needed to improve governance and public trust. Coordination is needed because investment-led growth depends on mutually reinforcing reforms.

If these constraints are addressed, Romania can move from a narrative of potential to a record of delivery. If they are not, the country risks repeating a familiar pattern: strong growth episodes followed by fiscal correction, investor hesitation, and delayed reform. The policy objective should therefore be to make implementation capacity the central measure of success. Romania’s next development phase will not be defined only by how much capital is available, but by how effectively that capital is allocated, governed, and converted into productivity.

References

1. OECD, OECD Economic Surveys: Romania 2024 (Paris: OECD Publishing, 2024), https://doi.org/10.1787/106b32c4-en. ↑
2. International Monetary Fund, Romania: 2025 Article IV Consultation—Press Release; Staff Report; and Statement by the Executive Director for Romania, IMF Country Report No. 25/294 (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund, 2025). ↑
3. European Commission, Romania’s Recovery and Resilience Plan, Recovery and Resilience Facility, accessed May 12, 2026. ↑
4. European Commission, 2025 Country Report: Romania, European Semester Country Reports, Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs, June 4, 2025. ↑
5. Bucharest Stock Exchange, Annual Consolidated Report 2024 (Bucharest: Bucharest Stock Exchange, 2025). ↑
6. European Commission, 2025 Country Report: Romania, European Semester Country Reports, Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs, June 2025. The report notes that regional disparities remain large, ranging from Bucharest-Ilfov at 154% of the EU average to the North-East region at 47%, and links productivity differences to skills, educational attainment, and investment in physical capital. ↑
7. European Commission, “EU Cohesion Policy: €31.5 billion for Romania’s economic, social and territorial cohesion, competitiveness and green and digital transition in 2021–2027,” July 25, 2022. ↑
8. European Parliament, Economic Governance and EMU Scrutiny Unit, Romania’s Fiscal Situation: State-of-Play and Legal Framework, 2025. The note reports that Romania’s general government deficit reached 9.3% of GDP in 2024 and was forecast to remain far above the 3% EU reference value in 2025. ↑
9. OECD, OECD Economic Surveys: Romania 2024 (Paris: OECD Publishing, 2024), https://doi.org/10.1787/106b32c4-en. ↑
10. European Commission, 2025 Country Report: Romania, June 2025. ↑
11. Ministry of Investments and European Projects, “45 de miliarde de euro pentru transformarea României: Comisia Europeană a aprobat Acordul de Parteneriat pentru perioada 2021–2027.” ↑
12. B.F.G. Fabrègue, “Romania’s Place in the European Southeastern Flank: Historical Ambitions and Structural Limits,” Blue Europe, August 13, 2025, https://www.blue-europe.eu/analysis-en/full-reports/romanias-place-in-the-european-southeastern-flank-historical-ambitions-and-structural-limits/. ↑
13. Government of Romania, “Investments for Romania worth €16.68 billion through the European SAFE Programme,” September 9, 2025. ↑
14. National Institute of Statistics, “Romania’s Foreign Trade,” 2025. ↑
15. Bucharest Stock Exchange, BVB Directors’ Consolidated Report 2024 (Bucharest: Bucharest Stock Exchange, 2025), 4, 10. ↑
16. Financial Supervisory Authority, “Private Pension Funds in Romania Reach New Record Highs,” September 2024. ↑
17. Bucharest Stock Exchange, BVB Directors’ Consolidated Report 2024, 13–15. ↑
18. Bucharest Stock Exchange, BVB Directors’ Consolidated Report 2024, 10. ↑
19. FTSE Russell, FTSE Equity Country Classification Announcement: October 2024 (London: FTSE Russell, 2024). ↑
20. Financial Supervisory Authority, “MSCI Recognizes Romania’s Capital Market as an ‘Advanced Frontier Market,’” June 26, 2025. ↑
21. European Commission, Romania’s Recovery and Resilience Plan, Recovery and Resilience Facility, accessed May 12, 2026; European Commission, “EU Cohesion Policy: €31.5 billion for Romania’s economic, social and territorial cohesion, competitiveness and green and digital transition in 2021–2027,” July 25, 2022. ↑
22. B.F.G. Fabrègue, “Romanian Energy Sector: How Current Events Might Foster Its Development,” Blue Europe, December 8, 2022, https://www.blue-europe.eu/analysis-en/short-analysis/romanian-energy-sector-how-current-events-might-foster-its-development/. ↑
23. International Energy Agency, “Romania: Energy Mix,” accessed May 12, 2026. ↑
24. OMV Petrom and Romgaz, “OMV Petrom and ROMGAZ spud the first gas production well of Neptun Deep project,” March 25, 2025. ↑
25. Bucharest Stock Exchange, BVB Directors’ Consolidated Report 2024 (Bucharest: Bucharest Stock Exchange, 2025). ↑
26. Financial Supervisory Authority, “Private Pension Funds in Romania Reach New Record Highs,” September 2024. ↑
27. EY Romania, “Romanian M&A evolution during the first nine months of 2024,” October 2024. ↑
28. European Parliament, Economic Governance and EMU Scrutiny Unit, Romania’s Fiscal Situation: State-of-Play and Legal Framework, 2025. ↑
29. Simona-Beatrice Manolache & Alexandru-Mihai Firu & Cristian Marian Radu, 2025. “EU Cohesion Policy 2021–2027: Absorption Trends and Structural Challenges in Romania,” Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development Studies, “Dunarea de Jos” University of Galati, Doctoral Field Engineering and Management in Agriculture and Rural Development, issue 3, pages 66-80. ↑
30. Amalia Dania Berinde, “For a Better Future of NEETs in Romania,” Blue Europe, September 8, 2023, updated August 19, 2025, https://www.blue-europe.eu/analysis-en/full-reports/for-a-better-future-of-neets-in-romania/. ↑
31. Cedefop, Vocational Education and Training Policy Briefs 2024: Romania, 2024. ↑